QCY Rental Property Management Platform

OverviewManaging rental properties can be a complex and time consuming task for landlords. The burden of paperwork, lease management, tenant screening process, financial responsibilities and miss communication between tenants/landlords can hinder efficiency and scalability. QCY Rental Property Management Platform offers comprehensive and efficient AI solutions for property owners and managers to streamline their operations and enhance their rental property management experiences.

Target Users:
Primary Users - Landlords
Secondary User - Tenants

My Role:
UI/UX Product Designer

Design Tools Used

Figma

UI Design & Interaction Prototype

Google Material Design

Provides a simple, customizable, and accessible library of React components

Adobe Illustrator

Icon creation & modification

UX Research Methods

In-person / Phone Interviews

1 on 1 phone interviews were mostly done using Zoom or Google Meet voice chat with selected users.

Online Questionnaire

Mostly used on gathering general feedbacks and validations.

Tools For Data Gathering

Google Analytics

Used for usage data recording & analysis.

Hotjar

Used for heatmaps and user behaviour recording.

Design Approach

1. Research, Empathize and DefineGather feedback from users through in-person/phone call interviews to find out more about their needs and expectations.
Synthesize a list that contains the pain points and insights gathered from user interviews and competitive product research.

2. Ideate, Design and PrototypeGather feedback from users through in-person/phone call interviews to find out more about their needs and expectations.
Synthesize a list that contains the pain points and insights gathered from user interviews and competitive product research.

3. Test and ValidateCreate realistic looking fully interactive prototypes to run user testing sessions on. Optimize the design according to user insights gathered during testing.
Product development will start when major problem no longer surfaces during further user testing sessions.

1. Research, Empathize and Define

1. Business Validation Survey
The Survey is answered by 15 possible target audiences. We asked a set of questions to validate the product idea, determine correct target audiences, and filter the candidates for future 1 on 1 user interview. From the survey, the majority said that the problem is worth solving
The survey questions are:
1. Are you a Tenant or Landlord or other?
2. How well do you understand the concept as described above?
3. Is this a problem worth solving in your world?
4. If the problem is applicable to you, how are you solving it currently and what are your frustrations with the available tools?
5. If the problem is not currently applicable to you, how could it be made applicable?
6. Is there something else out there that you know of that is similar to what is being proposed? If yes, how is it different from what is being proposed? If yes, how is it the same to what is being proposed?
7. Describe the experience you would want to have with this product as a user
8. If you were to suggest modifications to the above, what would be your top piece of advice?
9. What do you respect about this idea?

The key finding from the survey:
Learning 1The landlords wants a streamlined tenant screening.
Learning 2
They want good communication between landlords and tenants.
Learning 3
They express an interest to reduce paperwork and data entry tasks.

2. User Interviews
Moving from idea validation to user interviews. 10 interviews are conducted with 6 landlord and 4 property managers. The interviews will explore these specific areas, aiming to gather detailed insights to refine our property management product features. This step is crucial for ensuring our design aligns closely with real user pain points and needs.
User Interview Questions:
- What are the top three features you would want in an ideal property management tool?
- How do you prioritize tasks like tenant screening, communication, and paperwork in your daily management activities?
- If there was one thing you could change about your current property management process, what would it be?
- Have you faced any challenges with technology in managing your properties? How do you think these can be addressed in a digital solution?
- What specific aspects of the tenant screening process do you find most cumbersome or time-consuming?
- Have you used any tenant screening tools or services in the past? What did you like or dislike about them?
- Can you describe a situation where communication with a tenant was particularly challenging? What made it difficult?
- What features would you value in a communication tool designed specifically for landlords and tenants?
- What kind of paperwork or administrative tasks do you believe could be automated to save you time?
- How comfortable are you with using digital tools for managing property-related documentation?

Key Insights from Interviews:
Tenant ScreeningLandlords favor tenant screening that includes both financial and behavioral checks, indicating a need for multifaceted screening tools.

Real-Time Communication
Delays in traditional communication highlight a demand for instant messaging features within the property management tool.

Automated Lease ManagementThe manual management of leases is a common pain point, suggesting a strong interest in automated lease features.

Varied Tech ComfortDiverse levels of digital comfort among landlords call for an easily navigable user interface, catering to all users.
Financial Tool IntegrationA need for integration with existing financial management systems is evident, pointing towards a requirement for compatible functionalities.
3. Personas
After analyzing the data from our user interviews, we created user personas for our property management product. These personas represent our diverse range of landlords, capturing their key needs and challenges. By turning our interview insights into these fictional yet realistic characters, we can better tailor our product design to meet the actual needs of our users.

4. User Journey MapPersona Susan discovers the property management system through a professional recommendation and becomes familiar with its features through a webinar. She registers her properties and transitions to the digital system by uploading tenant data and setting up financial oversight tools. The system's dashboard allows her to manage rent, vacancies, and maintenance requests efficiently. Using the system's analytics, she adjusts rental pricing in response to market trends and finds reliable service providers for property improvements. The system ultimately enhances Susan's property management efficiency and financial performance.

5. Competitive Analysis
In our UX case study, the competitive analysis serves as a crucial step in understanding the market landscape and user needs. By examining a range of existing property management tools, we aim to identify gaps, evaluate strengths and weaknesses, and align our design strategy with the real-world requirements of our target personas, like David, the seasoned landlord. This analysis not only informs our design decisions but also ensures that our solution stands out in the market, addressing specific user pain points and preferences with precision and empathy.

The rental property management software market prioritizes comprehensive features and ease of use. Key insights reveal a need for intuitive platforms with minimal training requirements. Gaps in the market include integration with AI and Large Language Models, particularly in tenant screening and data analysis. The platform could stand out by balancing advanced features with a user-friendly design, robust support, and seamless AI features.

6. OpportunitiesTransitioning from the in-depth insights gained through our personas, like David and Sarah, and the findings from our competitive analysis, we now turn our focus to the distinct opportunities that our product presents. This section will explore how our enhanced understanding of user needs and market gaps enables us to craft a property management tool that not only fills these voids but also introduces innovative features and experiences. Here, we'll delve into how our product stands to redefine the landscape of property management, offering unique solutions that resonate deeply with our users' evolving demands and the industry's unmet needs.

2. Ideate, Design and Prototype

1. Design System and Information ArchitectureNow we have determined and understoodd the persona's pain points, opportunities, and industry standard features; the information architecture, user flow, and wireframes were created via activities such as cards sorting and tree testing to test agreed general direction and to clarify content blocks and fix the structure of the product.

2. Color System, Low Fidelity and High Fidelity PrototypesIn order to create a prototype, the product need to determine a design system. The design system was based on Google Material Design Guide. The dark blue and very light blue/white bought a steady contrast and professional feel to the product. In terms of typography, the Roboto font was used to freshen things up and create a unique and professional atmosphere that fits the product's theme.

3. Test and Validate

Moving forward with our property management tool, we are entering the user testing stage, an essential step in refining our prototype. This phase involves engaging with a group of users who closely resemble our intended audience, including landlords and property managers, to evaluate the tool's usability and effectiveness. These participants will be asked to perform specific tasks using the prototype, simulating real-world scenarios.
1. Tasks and Success Criteria
Task 1:
Use the AI Tenant Screening to evaluate a mock tenant application.
Success Criteria 1: The user is able to complete the screening process without assistance.
Success Criteria 2: The user finds the AI recommendations understandable and actionable.

Task 2:
Perform a series of navigational steps to access various features of the platform.
Success Criteria 1: The user can navigate the platform intuitively and reach the desired feature quickly.
Success Criteria 2: The user experiences no confusion or difficulty in understanding the UI layout.

Through observation and feedback collection, we aim to identify any usability issues, gather insights on user experience, and understand the tool's overall appeal. This process will not only help pinpoint areas for improvement but also ensure that the final product aligns closely with user needs and expectations, maintaining both professionalism and ease of use. The following are some of the feedbacks:

2. Feedback and Learnings

Task 1 (AI Tenant Screening):
- User Independence Feedback: "I was able to complete the screening without asking for help, but I had to look around a bit to find where to start."
- Understanding AI Recommendations Feedback: "The AI's suggestions were clear, but I wasn't sure how it made certain decisions. Maybe a brief explanation of the reasoning would help."
- Suggestions for Improvement: Several users suggested adding a feature to compare multiple tenant applications side-by-side for easier decision-making.
- Ease of Use Learning: While most users completed the task, some hesitated at certain steps, indicating the need for more intuitive cues or instructions at those points.

Task 2 (Platform Navigation):
- Intuitive Navigation Feedback: "Finding my way around was mostly straightforward, but I got lost trying to find the settings menu. Maybe it could be more prominent."
- UI Clarity Feedback: "The layout is clean, maybe provide some tooltips or labels could help me to understand the AI system."
- Speed and Efficiency Learning: Users reached most features quickly, but some consistently paused at the same junctions, suggesting these areas might benefit from simplification.
- Suggestions for UI Optimization: A common suggestion was to add a customizable dashboard where users can pin their most frequently used features for quick access.

Learning From This Case Study

This case study in UI/UX design for a property management platform offers valuable insights into the process of creating a user-centric digital product. It highlights the importance of understanding user needs, iterative testing, and adapting design to meet those needs effectively. From initial concept to prototype testing and refinement, the study emphasizes how user feedback and competitive analysis shape the development of a successful UI/UX design. Here are ten key learning outcomes from the case study:

User-Centered DesignEmphasizes the necessity of basing design decisions on user needs and feedback.

Iterative Development and TestingShows the effectiveness of an agile, iterative approach in refining a product.

User Behavior and Preferences InsightsProvides - valuable insights into specific user behaviors and preferences.

Design for Diverse User Skills
Highlights the need to cater to users with varying levels of tech-savviness.

Importance of Intuitive UIDemonstrates the significance of a clear and intuitive user interface.

User Feedback in Feature DevelopmentShows how user suggestions can directly influence feature enhancements.

Balancing Complexity and UsabilityIllustrates the challenge of balancing functional complexity with user usability.

Transparent AI Processes: Underlines the need for clarity and transparency in AI-driven features.

Comprehensive Support ResourcesStresses the importance of educational materials in enhancing user experience.

Learning from Competitive AnalysisReveals how understanding market gaps through competitive analysis can inform product development.